Paper topic #5

Julius Caesar left behind many papers, memoranda, etc., recording how he intended to deal with political appointments, internal issues, legislative initiatives, foreign policy matters, etc. These papers, along with Caesar’s various enactments while alive, are referred to as his acta.

Many Caesarians want approval of the acta out of self-interest, and believe that abolition of the acta would lead to chaos all over the empire. Indeed, the abolition of government appointments, financial arrangements, etc., could lead to social unrest and economic ruin, especially for those in debt. Approving the acta as a whole, on the other hand, is problematic, as a consul or other official could use the acta to justify and advance his own personal agenda in the future.

Republicans might feel that if the acta are still in effect, then the Caesarian system is still in effect. Some will argue that the acta logically should be rescinded since Caesar was a tyrant. By accepting the acta, the Senate in particular is binding itself to accept Caesar’s appointments to elective office. So Caesar, in spite of his death, will effectively control the direction future government is to take. Many Republicans may be outraged at Caesarians enjoying Pompeians’ property.

Should the Senate confirm Caesar’s acta?

Two pages, double-spaced, due in hard copy to Matt Wineski in class on FRIDAY, MARCH 28. Please e-mail to the Gamemaster at tkdix@uga.edu and post to the blog before class. You may post a longer version to the blog.